What Happens if the U.S. Defaults on Its Debt?
By Andrea Riquier, MarketWatch
Even as Washington managed to avoid an imminent government shutdown Thursday, here’s why the status of the nation’s debt ceiling may ignite more worry in financial markets.
Sept. 30 marks the end of the federal government’s fiscal year, and the deadline for Congress to pass a funding measure.
Thursday’s stop-gap measure keeps the government funded until early December.
The debt ceiling, which is the amount of money lawmakers authorize the Treasury Department to borrow to pay for spending already authorized, must be suspended or raised by Oct. 18, according to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, or the U.S. likely will default on its debt.
It’s important to note that no one knows precisely when the U.S. Treasury will run out of money to pay its bills, including bondholders, let alone what would happen next.
U.S. sovereign debt generally has been considered the safest and most liquid to own in the world, and all kinds of financial market products and processes have been pegged to the orderly functioning of the nearly $21 trillion Treasury market.
Still, after a couple of topsy-turvy years in which the previously unthinkable became real, some Washington and Wall Street professionals have been girding for a worst-case scenario.
“I see it as an exceedingly slim chance, although with all the theatrics, the possibility has been ramped up,” said Ben Koltun, director of research for D.C.-based Beacon Policy Advisors. “If it does happen, it turns a manufactured political crisis into an economic crisis. The full faith and credit of the U.S. would no longer be full.”
The stalemate on Capitol Hill right now is over a $3.5 trillion spending package.
Will the U.S. run out of money?
In a research note published Sept. 22, Barclays analyst Joseph Abate noted there’s additional uncertainty over the debt ceiling now because it coincides with a funding package Congress needs to pass.
What’s more, changes brought by the pandemic have made it far more difficult to assess the state of the Treasury Department’s expected payouts and inflows.
While most analysts expected a mid-October “X date,” when Treasury will run out of money to pay bills, Yellen on Tuesday told Congressional leaders that it would be Oct. 18. “At that point, we expect Treasury would be left with very limited resources that would be depleted quickly,” she wrote in an update.
Beacon’s Koltun, among others, thinks markets will start to get antsy even earlier than that.
The very idea of a U.S. default remains so incongruous that the reaction in financial markets isn’t the only unknown.
The current showdown in Washington also has raised big questions about the financial-systems infrastructure.
It’s a bit like Y2K—no one knows how the computers will respond.
“We do not believe and the market does not believe it’s a likely scenario,” said Rob Toomey, SIFMA managing director, capital markets and associate general counsel.
“But it would be a real problem scenario for the system generally and operations and settlement specifically.”
Plumbing problems
SIFMA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, is the industry association that deals with the mechanics of how securities like sovereign bonds trade and settle.
The group has worked with financial infrastructure providers including Fedwire and FICC to try to devise some sort of playbook.
For now, there are two possible scenarios:
If the Treasury Department knows that it will miss a payment, it would ideally announce that at least a day in advance.
That would allow the maturity dates of the bonds in question to be changed: a Monday maturity date would be changed to Tuesday, a Tuesday maturity would be changed to Wednesday, and so on.
These revisions would happen day by day.
While that sounds relatively orderly, it still leaves many unknowns.
For one thing, it could bifurcate the market for Treasury bonds and bills into those that are clearing normally and those whose maturity dates are being massaged, SIFMA told MarketWatch.
That means a great deal of uncertainty around pricing and what it means for all the downstream securities pegged to Treasury rates.
In a second scenario, which SIFMA said would be very remote, Treasury cannot, or does not, give any advance warning of a failure to make a payment, and it just happens.
That would be far more chaotic, “a real problem scenario,” as SIFMA says.
Strangely, the securities in question would probably simply disappear from the system.
That’s because if a bond is supposed to mature—and be paid—on a particular day, the system assumes it has been.
“It just illustrates the fact that the system wasn’t designed for this,” SIFMA notes.
If that happens, there would be a holder of record for the debt on the day before the maturity was scheduled, who would be entitled to get paid.
However, it’s also likely that Treasury might pay some additional interest to make the bondholder whole.
Many analysts, including Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi, think it’s highly likely that a financial market freak-out—think of the day in 2008 when Congress initially failed to pass the Troubled Asset Relief Program legislation meant to address the financial crisis—would stop any of the scenarios SIFMA envisions before they happen, or a few minutes after midnight on the day they will.
What Koltun calls a “game of chicken” also may already be denting the economy.
The last two times Congress came close to not raising the debt limit, in 2011 and 2013, Moody’s Analytics found, “heightened uncertainty at the time reduced business investment and hiring and weighed heavily on GDP growth.
If not for this uncertainty, by mid-2015, real GDP would have been $180 billion, or more than 1%, higher; there would have been 1.2 million more jobs; and the unemployment rate would have been 0.7 percentage point lower.”
Uncertainty rippling through the Treasury market in 2013 cost taxpayers anywhere from $40 million to $70 million, Barclay’s reckons.
0 comments:
Publicar un comentario