Blowing Off The Roof
By: Peter Schiff
Of all the absurd Washington pantomimes none has been as reliably entertaining and maddening as the annual debates to raise the debt ceiling. Although the outcome was always a foregone conclusion (the ceiling would be raised), the excitement came when fiscal conservatives bemoaned the perils of runaway debt and “attempted” to exact spending restrictions through threats “to shut down the government,” (which often led to news coverage of tourists being turned away from national parks.) On the other side of the aisle Democrats would rail that the ceiling must be raised “because America always pays her bills.” Lost was the irony that “paying” bills with borrowed money was fiscally responsible, and that raising the ceiling actually enabled America to continue to avoid paying its bills. After these amateur theatrics, the ceiling would be lifted and Washington would go on as if nothing happened. But at least the performance threw occasional light on the nation’s debt problems.
But this week the news dropped that President Trump had made a “gentleman’s agreement” with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to permanently scrap the “debt ceiling” so that government borrowing can occur perpetually without the need to air the nation’s fiscal dirty laundry. Given how much the national debt has exploded in recent decades, and how reluctant Congress has been to address the problem, it should be no surprise that the proposal has finally been made. The only shock is that it happening when the Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress.
The news came just a day after the President stunned the Republican party by abruptly siding with Congressional Democrats over the best way to deal with current debt ceiling negotiations.
These developments should make it clear, as I described in the weeks after Trump moved into the White House, that budget deficits during the Trump administration will be far larger than just about anyone predicted. In fact, the self-proclaimed “King of Debt” is reaching for his crown and the coronation profoundly affect the fate of the U.S. dollar and the American economy.
Trump came to the White House with essentially no history of stated aversion to government spending and debt accumulation. Instead, he won the votes of Republicans and some independents by staking out extreme positions on immigration, terrorism, and economic nationalism, and by thumbing his nose at a political establishment much deserving of ridicule.
Unlike almost all other Republicans, he had nothing to say about fiscal prudence, limited government, entitlement reform, spending cuts, or balanced budgets. In fact, he very rarely criticized government for being too large, but simply for being too stupid.
But as a businessman Trump had made his successes by borrowing, and then by borrowing even bigger when his ventures fell deeply into the red. There really should have been no doubt that he would bring those instincts with him into the Oval Office. Republicans who thought otherwise have no one but themselves to blame for what the future holds.
The debt ceiling came into existence just a few years after the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. At the time that the bank was established many politicians, and certainly many citizens, were concerned that it could potentially lend unlimited funds to the government, a capacity that could short-circuit constitutional checks and balances and lead to the development of a Federal behemoth. As a result, the Fed’s original charter prevented the bank from buying or owning obligations of the U.S. Treasury. This provision allayed the fears of unlimited borrowing and it helped Congress approve the Act.
But just a few years later the United States entered the First World War. The massive expenses associated with quickly waging war on an unprecedented scale was too much for the government’s ability to tax or borrow directly from the public. Instead Congress changed the charter to allow the Fed to buy debt from the government. But to prevent this power from being absolute, Congress set limits. This “debt ceiling” has been with us ever since. But since it has been raised so many times in the past 100 years (every time the issue has come up), the intent of the law has been essentially neutered and now appears to be an archaic vestige with no real purpose; the fiscal equivalent of an appendix.
But in reality it is much more than that. For years Republicans have paid mountains of lip service to the need for a Balanced Budget Amendment as the only way to force government to live within its means. But the existence of the Debt Ceiling had given them that power all along. Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz, all conservatives had to do was click their heels together three times and not vote to raise the debt ceiling. And just like that our budgets would have had to be balanced. But Republicans just like to talk about balanced budgets. They never really wanted to actually balance them.
But even the possibility helped. One of the primary reasons that annual government deficits declined by two thirds between 2010 and 2015 (from $1.4 trillion to $450 billion) was because the Republican-controlled Congress was able to get the Obama administration to agree to the so-called “sequester” which capped the level of growth in a variety of Federal programs, including social programs and the military. Absent the leverage provided by the debt ceiling, sequester never would have seen the light of day. It is clear however that most of those negotiations were political in nature: Republicans beating on a Democrat president with any club they could find. But the end result was good for the country. Now that a “Republican” is on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, no clubs are being sought.
In fact, voting to raise the debt ceiling was always politically embarrassing for Republicans. To provide cover the measures were usually pared with some other politically popular legislation.
In many cases some Republicans would be given the nod from leadership to vote no, as they could cast their votes against it knowing it would pass anyway. But eliminating the ceiling makes it that much easier for Republicans to campaign one way and govern another.
But the potential failure to raise the debt ceiling has never been the problem. It’s the debt that’s the problem, and the ceiling is a tool to solve the problem that vote-seeking politicians are afraid to actually use. If we eliminate the only tool, the problem will never be fixed. If the debt ceiling were to be cut out like an unneeded appendix, we should expect that America’s foray into debt creation, which has already been fantastical, to journey even farther into the looking glass. America’s funded national debt is already just a few clicks below $20 Trillion. If we were able to amass that much debt with a ceiling, even one that could be raised, imagine how much more debt will be run up with no ceiling at all!
In the end we may be able to repeal our self-imposed debt ceiling, but our creditors may not care. When we drop even the pretense of a theoretic limit to our profligacy, our lenders may decide its time to impose a lending ceiling of their own. That is a ceiling we have no power to raise, and it could force our leaders to finally make some very unpopular choices. Massive cuts to government spending, including to current Social Security and Medicare benefits, huge middle class tax hikes, or an actual default on the national debt. Since neither of these alternatives is politically viable, I believe the coward’s way out will be a massive QE program where the Fed buys the bonds our creditors no longer want. This could be the worst possible choice for the U.S. economy, and investors should be prepared. It could produce a dollar and sovereign debt crisis that will dwarf the financial crisis of 2008 with respect to its impact on the American economy. It could make hurricane Irma look like a sun shower.
BLOWING OFF THE ROOF / EURO PACIFIC CAPITAL
"THE MOST IMPORTANT CHART IN THE WORLD / CASEY DAILY DISPATCH
“The Most Important Chart in the World”
By Justin Spittler, editor, Casey Daily Dispatch
Do you own U.S. stocks? If so, you have to see this…
The chart below doesn’t show a stock, a commodity, or even a high-flying cryptocurrency.
Instead, it depicts an unstoppable trend that most investors have never even thought about. See for yourself.
You’re looking at the percentage of people living in the United States who are 65 years of age or older.
You can see that the number of seniors in the United States is about to explode.
This may not seem like a big deal to the casual observer. But it’s going to have profound investment implications.
Don’t just take my word for it, though.
• Two weeks ago, Raoul Pal called this “the single most important chart in the world”…
That’s a bold statement. But Pal knows what he’s talking about.
He used to run hedge fund sales at Goldman Sachs. He later comanaged the GLG Global Macro Fund, one of the world’s biggest hedge funds.
Pal made so much money by the age of 36 that he stopped managing outside money in 2004. But he didn’t completely retire.
Today, Pal writes the Global Macro Investor newsletter, one of the world’s most exclusive investment newsletters. His readers include hedge fund managers, sovereign wealth funds, and pension funds.
In short, Pal is one of the world’s top “big picture” thinkers. It pays to listen to him.
• So, I started researching U.S. demographics immediately after I saw this…
And it didn’t take me long to realize something…
Pal isn’t the only big-league investor who thinks this is a big deal.
Bill Gross is also deeply concerned about America’s aging population.
Gross is one of the world’s leading bond experts. He used to run PIMCO, one of the world’s largest money managers. Today, he manages about $1.9 billion at Janus Capital.
In January, Gross said demographics would likely “dominate investment markets and returns for the next few decades until the Boomer phenomena fades away.”
• Mark Yusko is deeply concerned about America’s aging population, too…
Yusko is another Wall Street legend. He manages $1.6 billion at Morgan Creek Capital.
Like Pal and Gross, Yusko thinks demographics will drive stock performance for years to come…and not in a good way.
He thinks bad demographics will be one of three “killer D’s” facing the U.S. economy. The other two “D’s” are debt and deflation, which are another way of saying slow economic growth.
• These are some of the smartest investors on the planet…
They didn’t climb to the top of Wall Street by thinking like other investors. They got there by being original thinkers.
And yet, they’re worried about the same thing: America’s aging population.
Of course, they have good reason to be.
• Just look at what happened to Japan…
Japan’s population exploded after World War II.
This triggered a huge economic boom. It became one of the world’s most advanced economies.
Then, everything came undone in the early ‘90s.
Japan’s economy imploded and entered a vicious downturn.
Times were tough. So, many Japanese people stopped having children. And that’s left huge scars on its society.
• Last year was the eighth year in a row that Japan’s population shrank…
It was also the first time on record that less than 1 million babies were born in Japan. Meanwhile, the number of deaths in Japan hit a record high of 1.3 million.
Japan’s rapidly aging population is killing its economy.
Just look at this chart. It shows Japan’s annual economic output over the last two decades.
You can see that Japan’s economy has barely grown. It’s only 1% bigger than it was in 1997.
• Bad demographics have also plagued Japan’s stock market…
You can see what I mean below.
This chart shows the performance of the Nikkei 225, Japan’s version of the S&P 500, since 1997.
The Nikkei is up just 4% over this period.
In other words, Japanese stocks have been “dead money” for the past two decades.
• Now, the United States is about to get stung by the aging-population bug…
By 2030, more than 20% of the U.S. population will be at least 65 years old. That’s up from about 15% today.
By 2050, the U.S. will have twice as many seniors as it does today.
And many of these people will retire. They’ll stop producing for the economy.
They’ll also buy fewer godos and services. That’s what happens when people retire. Seniors spend about 38% less on consumer goods and services than people in the workforce.
That’s a serious problema.
After all, consumption makes up 70% of the U.S. economy. So, the economy could take a major hit if millions of people start buying fewer goods and services. If that happens, U.S. stocks could come crashing down, too.
• Just to be clear, I’m not saying the U.S. will become the next Japan…
But demographics in the U.S. are certainly getting worse. There’s no denying that.
And there’s nothing the government can do to stop it. The trend is in motion.
The good news is that there’s still time to prepare. Here’s what you can do today…
Lighten up on U.S. stocks. Now, I’m not saying you should hit the panic button. But now is a good time to reduce your exposure to U.S. stock holdings.
You can start by trimming your stake in risky U.S. stocks. You should also allocate less money to U.S. stocks going forward.
Move some money abroad. Focus on countries with improving demographics. That means countries with young and growing populations. Here are three countries that check those boxes…
• India
• Vietnam
• Indonesia
If you take these steps today, you’ll be miles ahead of most investors.
AN AMERICAN POLITICAL TRAGEDY / PROJECT SYNDICATE
An American Political Tragedy
Helmut K. Anheier
BERLIN – US President Donald Trump’s nearly eight months in office have been characterized by a series of disturbing political developments. But Trump is not entirely to blame. His presidency is just the latest act in a long-running political tragedy.
Helmut K. Anheier is President and Professor of Sociology at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin.
A Country Is Its People
By George Friedman

The Canadian Rockies in the Banff National Forest Nov. 30, 2006 during morning sunrise. AFP PHOTO / JEFF HAYNES (Photo credit should read JEFF HAYNES/AFP/Getty Images
Bienvenida
Les doy cordialmente la bienvenida a este Blog informativo con artículos, análisis y comentarios de publicaciones especializadas y especialmente seleccionadas, principalmente sobre temas económicos, financieros y políticos de actualidad, que esperamos y deseamos, sean de su máximo interés, utilidad y conveniencia.
Pensamos que solo comprendiendo cabalmente el presente, es que podemos proyectarnos acertadamente hacia el futuro.
Gonzalo Raffo de Lavalle
Friedrich Nietzsche
Quien conoce su ignorancia revela la mas profunda sabiduría. Quien ignora su ignorancia vive en la mas profunda ilusión.
Lao Tse
“There are decades when nothing happens and there are weeks when decades happen.”
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
You only find out who is swimming naked when the tide goes out.
Warren Buffett
No soy alguien que sabe, sino alguien que busca.
FOZ
Only Gold is money. Everything else is debt.
J.P. Morgan
Las grandes almas tienen voluntades; las débiles tan solo deseos.
Proverbio Chino
Quien no lo ha dado todo no ha dado nada.
Helenio Herrera
History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.
Karl Marx
If you know the other and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
Sun Tzu
Paulo Coelho

Archivo del blog
-
►
2020
(2007)
- ► septiembre (145)
-
►
2019
(2103)
- ► septiembre (187)
-
►
2018
(1928)
- ► septiembre (173)
-
▼
2017
(1947)
- ► septiembre (160)
-
►
2016
(2576)
- ► septiembre (182)