Stall Speed Economy
By John Mauldin
When Cornwallis surrendered to George Washington at Yorktown in
1781, tradition has it that the British band played an old English children’s
folk tune, “The World Turned Upside Down.”
Painting by
John Trumbull
If buttercups buzz’d after the bee,
If boats were on land,
churches on sea,
If ponies rode men and if
grass ate the cows,
And cats should be chased into
holes by the mouse,
If the mamas sold their babies
To the gypsies for half a
crown;
If summer were spring and the
other way ‘round,
Then all the world would be
upside down.
In this letter I find myself recommending policies that not that
long ago would have been extraordinarily distasteful to me. Yet, unless we
pursue them, our economy will truly be turned upside down. I fully recognize
these things have a cost. But the cost of inaction is much higher.
Our economic prospects looked bleak back in March and April. Much
of the economy was closed down, we didn’t know how bad the virus would get, and
it was hard to see a good outcome.
Now the outlook is relatively
better. Unemployment, GDP, and other indicators aren’t great but they’ve
improved. Yet a “better” outlook isn’t necessarily a good one. It’s just “not as
bad.” Today’s numbers would be considered terrible if we weren’t comparing them
to truly disastrous numbers from last spring. We avoided the worst because
generous fiscal income replacement and business lifelines maintained consumer
spending, and in some cases increased it.
If you fly a lot as I do (or used to), you’ve heard the term
“stall speed.” An airplane needs to go a certain speed in order to stay aloft.
The math behind that idea is pretty simple: lift from the wings must be equal to or
greater than the plane’s weight. Lift, in turn, comes from the engine creating
forward motion relative to the air. No air flow over the wings means no lift
and no flight.
In economic terms, we stayed above stall speed by forcing extra fuel
into the engine. The resulting forward motion gave the economy the lift it
needed. Now the fuel is running out.
If this plane stalls, as is a real possibility, we won’t like the result. Today we’ll talk about why that is and how to stop it
The first point to observe: unlike airline passengers, we don’t
all share the same forward momentum. Some of us are even going backwards.
Income loss comes mainly from job loss. This year’s job losses
have been concentrated in lower-wage service jobs, often held by less-educated
workers.
Source: BLS
Unemployment rose across the board but was much higher for those
with less education. As of August, the headline unemployment rate was 8.4%, but
it was 11.8% for non-high school graduates and only 5.6% for college graduates.
Continued unemployment claims from states suggest the monthly
report undercounted the jobless workers. I assume there was some seasonal
adjustment that made the difference, but seasonal adjustments are worthless during
this crisis. “U-6” unemployment is a far better indicator of where we really
are.
Source: BLS
My good friend Mike Shedlock (Mish) does an extraordinarily good
job tracking the vagaries of unemployment during this crisis. Including both
state and federal benefits shows a far larger number. The chart below includes
gig workers, the self-employed, people who have exhausted their state benefits,
etc.
Source: Mike Shedlock
Anybody with any connection to the real economy knows people are
still falling through the cracks. We just have no way to measure it. As I
mentioned, U-6 is 14.3%. I’ll bet you a dollar to 47 doughnuts that real
unemployment is closer to 16%. The rest of Mike’s post points out that while things are improving, the
rate of improvement is slowing down. But back to my main point.
For a while, “unemployment” didn’t necessarily mean income loss because Congress temporarily increased jobless benefits by a flat $600 weekly, while also sending out $1,200 per person checks, actually raising some workers’ incomes.
That expired at the end of July. Trump’s stopgap measures have replaced some of
it, in some states, but the amounts are much smaller.
This is already showing up in consumer spending. Banks can track this because most of the benefits are delivered electronically.
They can
analyze spending patterns for unemployment benefit recipients vs. everyone
else. Here is what happened at Bank of America in August.
Source: Ernie Tedeschi
As benefits dropped, bank card spending growth fell for UI
recipients while continuing to grow for everyone else. The drop was worse for
lower-income consumers.
This shouldn’t surprise us. Long before COVID-19, a large part of
the population spent practically all its income. Those who lost their jobs in
March/April and haven’t been rehired have little choice but to cut spending.
They have no reserves and little borrowing ability.
A few years ago, I wrote that 60% of America had less than $500 in
savings. I haven’t seen recent data, but it is hard to imagine it’s gotten any
better. The point back then
was that Americans were living paycheck to paycheck. The point now is that many
Americans are living unemployment check to unemployment check.
It’s easy to forget that the enhanced unemployment benefits helped
more than the unemployed people. In many cases, the “recipients” were simply
conduits. They received money from the government and immediately sent it on to
their lenders and landlords. The fiscal stimulus kept those people afloat, too.
And its ending will hurt them, too.
In fact, the income loss hits across the board. Bank of America also knows where unemployment recipients have been spending, since it processes their card transactions.
Source: Ernie Tedeschi
We see spending affected most in discretionary items like
clothing, but also in grocery stores. And remember, this is only just
beginning. Benefits payments come in arrears, so many people still got the
higher amount in early August.
Quick math: If 20% of the adult population reduces spending 25%, the net effect is consumer spending falls 5%. That, alone, leads to an even deeper stall-speed recession. It will generate more layoffs and bankruptcies, meaning more unemployment, until something gives the economy the lift it needs.
Our gridlocked US political system initially reacted to this crisis with surprising speed, passing several relief bills in March and April. At that point, they expected it would be a few weeks of lockdown then everyone would go back to work.
The goal was to “freeze” the economy in place,
compensate those who couldn’t work, and target aid to small businesses,
airlines, and other affected sectors. The plan had flaws but, under the
circumstances, was an impressive example of cooperation and compromise.
Less impressively, the Federal Reserve began throwing liquidity in all directions. This kept financial markets functional and banks open, but at the cost of blowing a market bubble that will, when it pops, negate most of the benefits.
Fed officials knew this, I suspect, but also knew they had to do something.
They don’t have
the tools to directly stimulate employment or capital spending. Jerome Powell
has said many times that fiscal policymakers need to do their part.
The politicians, predictably, split on partisan lines. House Democrats passed a $3+ trillion bill that would extend the pandemic unemployment programs, disburse aid to states and localities, give benefits to their favored groups, etc.
It has gone nowhere in the Senate, where Republicans
object to both the bill’s size and some of the recipients. Pelosi had to know
it was a nonstarter, just as Senate Republicans knew their $650 billion bill
was a nonstarter. But I admit that I am surprised that it has taken them this
long to find a compromise. It’s getting to the point where it is beyond
serious.
The economy is just barely at stall speed, coasting along on the previously generated momentum but unable to accelerate. It can only stay in the air so much longer, and our pilots are pointing fingers at each other instead of restarting the engines.
“Wait a second, Mauldin,” you may be saying. “You’re sounding
mighty Keynesian here.” You are correct. My track record for the last 40 years
is pretty much in favor of smaller government and government spending, lower
taxes, etc. But now the world is upside down. Quoting John Maynard Keynes,
“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”
We are in an unprecedented situation. Close to 30 million workers
are on unemployment benefits, and that’s after
a partial recovery that is now tapering off. Those benefits are the only thing
keeping us out of an outright depression that frankly could be worse than the
Great Depression (and I don’t think that’s a hyperbolic statement), and they
are about to disappear. I fully recognize my own philosophical flip-flop here.
But I would rather be called a hypocrite than see millions suffering.
The fact is, we haven’t seen anything like this before. It’s not
just another recession. The pandemic and our efforts to control it unleashed
economic demons. We need an exorcist or at least some holy water. Instead we
get boring sermons. I’m alarmed and you should be, too.
Philippa Dunne and Doug Henwood calculated this week the stopgap
benefit payments, cash for which is coming from FEMA disaster relief funds, are
almost exhausted:
FEMA is reporting that it’s spent
$30 billion of the $44 billion allocated by the executive order, though all
that spending has not showed up in the Daily Treasury Statement yet. In any case, the program will run out of
money in a week or two. In fact, a number of states have
already run through their allowances. The program will be history before the
month is over. And that $44 billion is a bit more than half what the CARES Act
program spent in its peak month, June—$80.4 billion. With nearly 28 million people drawing
traditional and expanded pandemic benefits, a lot of people are suffering sharp
cuts in income now and Congress doesn’t seem to be motivated to address the
problem.
I think we have to give Trump at least an A in creativity, if not
strict constitutionality, for his $300 a week plan. Congress has “power of the
purse” but refuses to use it. I’m sure administration lawyers are looking for
other creative financing, but there are important limits as to what the
president can do. The much better way would be for Congress to do its job,
because so much more is needed.
One objection to the extra unemployment benefits is they give some recipients more than they made while working, thereby creating a disincentive to work.
That is indeed a problem, though with the Labor Department reporting 2.5 unemployed workers for every job opening, it is far from the only challenge (see chart below). But it’s easily solved if the right people want to solve it.
Source: BLS
In fact, some in Congress are actually talking sense. A new
bipartisan House Problem Solvers Caucus unveiled a compromise proposal last week that may break the stalemate.
It would, among other things, resume the pandemic benefits at $450 a week for
two months, then cap the amount to not exceed $600 or the worker’s previous
wage, whichever is less.
From my point of view, an even better compromise would be to very slowly reduce the
unemployment benefits to provide incentive to go back to work. But that means
jobs have to be available. Right now, we have already lost 100,000 businesses
and it wouldn’t surprise me if that number doubles, or at least significantly
increases, over the next 6 to 12 months. That will be partially offset by new
businesses being created, but there will be a lag time.
(Sidebar: Let’s get real. Economists and analysts who use
historical precedent to predict this recovery are committing mathematical
economic malpractice. There is no historical analogy. This recovery is going to
take longer, absent a vaccine which may be available later this year, but will
take 6 to 9 months to actually deploy. And it may have to be an annual vaccine.
There is just so much we don’t know about this virus. Back to the letter…)
On the downside (from my perspective), the Problem Solvers
compromise bill would give state and local governments $500 billion. I think
states and local governments should cover their own expenses with their own
taxes. But that’s the nature of a compromise: No one gets everything they want.
You get a little, give a little, and move forward.
That last item is a major sticking point for Senate Republicans.
Yet, even there may be a compromise. Limiting the grants to actual revenues
lost should get enough Republicans to go along. It would work like this. Say
under the current compromise proposal, state A would get $4 billion. But its
revenue is actually only down $2 billion, still a large sum. If you replace
just the lost revenue, they would at least get something. Neither side will be
happy, but that is the nature of a compromise.
I realize we are in a contentious election season. Feelings are running high. I wish more people would realize our economic challenges transcend politics.
We will still be in deep trouble whether Trump or Biden is
president next year, and regardless of which party controls the House and
Senate. Neither side has all the answers. We need them to set aside the
rhetoric and take care of all
Americans.
My friend the late Pat Caddell, the famous Democratic pollster,
used to say later in life (and on my stage to great applause) he wasn’t a
Democrat or a Republican, but an American. In these tough times, I’m trying to
adopt that same attitude. Politics shouldn’t be a winner-take-all blood sport.
Making it one invites chaos because winners and losers still have to live
together.
And living together becomes difficult if you don’t even have a
place to live. Eviction notices are on hold right now, but not for long. Look
at this chart:
Source:
Arbor Data via The Daily Shot
We feel sorry for the poor people who are evicted, especially those with children.
But landlords are quite often small businesses too, with
mortgages that banks expect to be paid. It’s a vicious circle.
I plan to write another letter about the forces that brought us to
this place. For now, I hope everyone understands we are on the edge of a cliff.
Moves that would normally be harmless could spell disaster. We need leaders to
represent all
their constituents, not just those who voted for them. This necessarily means
compromise. Yes, I’m using that word a lot. It’s not profane. It is a way to
get things done. And right now, compromise may be the only way to keep this
plane in the air.
Keeping the plane in the air is more than just avoiding a crash.
It’s giving us the chance to bring it to a future runway safely.
It’s not all bleak. Even if true unemployment is 15%, it means 85%
of us are employed. A free market economy with 100,000 “unemployed”
entrepreneurs will soon figure out how to create jobs for the rest.
I am not saying a recovery is years off or impossible. I am
optimistic we will recover, but it is not going to be a typical 12-month cycle
to see recovery begin. We have to buy ourselves and those entrepreneurs some
time to figure out what a post-COVID-19 world looks like. The more time we can
buy, the stronger the recovery will be.
I get that adding debt will be a drag on economic growth. That
can’t be helped. There’s a hole in the boat and we have to plug it, and while
doing so we have to bail and row.
The world is going to be repriced. Everything. We are going to
have to find new uses for a lot of things now in surplus, like strip malls and
office space, lots of equipment, and those new uses may require lower prices.
All while technology is disrupting our world in ways we don’t understand. No
one ever said it would be easy.
The 85% of us who are working need to help those who aren’t.
Bigger tips. Donations to food banks (have you seen some of the lines for food
banks? Depressing.). Look around your own community. Are there ways you can
help the at-risk population? We are seeing an epidemic of depression and
suicide. Reach out to your neighbors who are lonely. I am sure you can think of
your own ways. Then just do it.
In the meantime, call your senators and representatives and tell them to do their @#$%# job. Don’t yell at them for compromising. Support them when they do. We can resume yelling at them when unemployment is 6%.
Gym Time and Bear Market Timing
Something very good happened last week. The governor opened up more of Puerto Rico, including my gym. But what Puerto Rico really needs is jobs.
The US Congress and the local government need to enact tax reform for pharmaceutical companies to come here. This used to be a pharmaceutical manufacturing powerhouse.
The buildings are still here and it can be so again 50,000 high-paying jobs would make a monster difference to this island.
To give the locals credit, they have introduced extraordinary incentives to build solar energy plants, and theoretically the bondholders who own the power company bonds can lease the lines to companies that build solar capacity.
The local power is so expensive (for good reasons, as we are an island) that solar can be a much cheaper alternative. All that construction would create jobs.
And one thing Puerto Rico does have is lots of sun and land
for solar plants. Now some entrepreneur just has to make it happen
Finally, I posted this on Twitter today from my friend Brent
Donnelly. You should follow me here. I get to do a lot more fun, quick posts
there. This is an historical reason why the next few days in the markets could
be rocky:
Source: Brent Donnelly
And with that, I will hit the send button and wish you a great
week!
Your planning on being in the gym more analyst,
|
John
Mauldin |
0 comments:
Publicar un comentario