lunes, 4 de julio de 2011

lunes, julio 04, 2011
Focus on the Next Half Year: Less Certainty Than Ever 

by: John Mauldin

July 2, 2011

We are halfway through the year, and what a ride it has been. Today I will share my thoughts on what the next six months could look like, and endeavor to keep it short and simple, as we have a holiday weekend. There will be more than a few charts. What does the end of QE2 mean? What can we expect from Europe? Is a commodity bubble getting ready to burst? Is it really a bubble? There is a lot to cover.


We Should Be OK, Except…


The economy should be in Muddle Through range (around 2% growth), absent any shocks. For instance, today we had the June ISM number, which was stronger than most analysts expected, at 55.3. There was a lot of whispering that it could dip below 50. Some of the internal components were a little soft, though. New Orders were barely above 50. And Backlogs fell below 50. Exports fell to the lowest level in two years (more on that below). Of the 18 industries surveyed, only 12 reported growth.


But Muddle Through is not going to allow us to really cut into the unemployment problem. We need at least 3% and most economists think we need to see 3.5% to result in some real strong jobs numbers for several months in a row. That just doesn’t seem to be in the cards. Richard Yamarone at Bloomberg is calling for a recession by the end of the year, and he sent me a rather vivid PowerPoint of his latest thoughts. Let me share a few of those slides with you.


The following chart shows what I mean by Muddle Through not being enough to really cut into unemployment. As GDP seems to be slowing rather than picking up, the correlation between employment and growth is not encouraging. And if you look at the NFIB (National Federation of Independent Businesses) data, small businesses are not really back in the hiring game, and that is where the action needs to happen. We will see a new survey next week, but I doubt we will see a major jump in expectations.






About two years ago I wrote a rather lengthy piece about why unemployment would be a problem until at least the middle of the decade. When you lose 8 million jobs, with about 2-3 million of those jobs permanently gone, it is tough to dig out of the hole. We can’t look to housing construction to be the driving force that it once was for another 3-4 years, and commercial construction is falling.


I was talking to a friend yesterday who is a director on two local bank boards. He pointed out that while the government wants banks to lend, the regulators (the Fed) are basically saying they can do development loans without very large equity components. They want 50% loan-to-value of very-reduced valuations. Let’s look at two charts from Rich. One shows commercial construction and the other shows regional and strip mall vacancies. Construction spending for May 2011 fell 0.6% below its revised level in April, and is 7.1% below its May 2010 level. This is not the stuff that makes real estate moguls want to part with their cash. Nor does it bode well for construction jobs.










OK, only two more charts from Rich. The first is the smoothed ECRI (Economic Cycle Research Institute) index over the last 20 years. We can see it turning over. The ECRI weekly leading index decreased to 126.4 for the week ending June 24, from an unrevised 127. The smoothed, annualized growth rate fell to 2% from an unrevised 2.9%. The ECRI WLI has been consistently losing momentum in recent months, adding to concerns about the sustainability of the recovery.






The ECRI itself points out that their index is simply signaling a weakening economy but does not signal a recession. And you can see that there have been similar downturns in the past without a recession or even a recovery. But the recent trend is disconcerting and must be watched.


And the last chart is one I had not seen before, and is interesting. Rich notes that if year-over-year GDP growth dips below 2%, a recession always follows. It is now at 2.3%.


Growth is clearly decelerating. Look at the growth numbers from the St. Louis Fed website for the last six quarters:


2009-10-01 13019.012


2010-01-01 13138.832


2010-04-01 13194.862


2010-07-01 13278.515


2010-10-01 13380.651


2011-01-01 13444.301


It will be very interesting to see, at the end of the month, what the numbers are for the second quarter. Another quarter like the first quarter and we should either be close to or actually dip below 2%.






What Happens if There Is a Shock?


The problem with a slow-growth economy that is basically at stall speed is, if there is any type of “exogenousshock, the economy can easily tip over into recession. There are several potential sources of a shock coming from the outside the U.S.


The first is from Europe. I have been writing about this for a very long time. It is the number one thing in my worry closet. We have dodged a short-term bullet with Greece and Europe coming to terms this week, but in late July they will have to find AT LEAST €50-70 billion more euros in loans and rollovers, and then more next year. Without projected asset sales it could reach €100 billion very easily. And willpower is waning on the part of creditor countries. Opposition against throwing good money after bad is increasing, as recent polls in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovakia have shown. How long Merkel can hold her coalition together in the face of growing discontent is not clear. Powerful, authoritative voices in Germany are starting a daily chorus of chantingno” to more bailouts.


And it is not just Greece. After Greece is dealt with, the Eurozone must deal with Ireland and Portugal. And the market is increasingly suggesting there is more risk there than the area can handle. Look at the graph below, which shows the steady rise of interest rates for Ireland and Portugal. This looks like Greece not so long ago. And Portugal now has higher rates than Ireland. This means that both countries are effectively cut out of the private market. (www.ifr.com)








Both countries keep saying they are not Greece, but the bond markets are not buying it. And as I noted last week, when Greece defaults-- and they will at some point-- the contagion to other countries will be quick and severe. Spain will be included. The Italian bank index has been in free fall of late.


Money is flying out of Greek banks. Indeed, deposits in all the peripheral countries are falling. It is quite possible we get a credit or banking crisis in Europe before we get a sovereign default crisis. The longer Greece waits, the more they try and kick the can down the road, the worse it gets for their banks. And Greece has NO money to bail out its banks. Look at this graph from Bridgewater:








And quoting Bridgewater (one of the more brilliant sources of information in the world):


“While the focus is for the moment on the question of bridging Greece’s immediate funding need, it’s important not to lose sight of the bigger picture, which is that indebtedness is not the periphery’s only problem, and is in many way only a symptom of the structural imbalances (extremely negative current account and budget deficit) that plague it. No amount of funding will change the fact that the periphery continues to be extremely uncompetitive; that in order to become competitive, it needs to become much cheaper; and that as long as it continues to be a member of the euro, the only way to achieve this is through sustained wage cuts and deflation that would need to be dramatically more extreme than the adjustments they’ve experienced thus far.”


This could put Europe into a recession. And that is not good for U.S. exports or for China. China is already in tightening mode. A hard landing is still too far away to call, but things could get softer, which will definitely affect commodity prices, which are already rolling over.


And Then There Was No QE


As of today, the only QE will be that of the Fed taking the drawdown on its mortgage book and using it to buy Treasuries, which it has been doing. The markets are going to have to come up with $50 billion in bond purchases, and the recent auctions have not been all that good. I know the markets liked the ISM numbers, but a lot of the rise this week was quarter-end gaming by mutual funds and money managers. Let’s see if there is follow through in July. The last time QE was stopped the markets swooned. That is only a data point of one, but it’s all we have.


I think the next six months are very risky. Maybe we avoid a crisis somewhere that affects the U.S. and thus the world. If we do-- and if Europe can kick the can down the road another six months-- then while a slowdown seems to be in the data, it is not yet suggesting a recession. I would be very careful about any long-only trades, whether it be stocks or commodities or bonds. We just don’t know – there is less certainty than at almost any time I can remember.

Disclaimer

John Mauldin is president of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC, a registered investment advisor. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions.

0 comments:

Publicar un comentario